Relief, rage, and passing the buck

Today, according to the Globe and Mail, President Bush

expressed unhappiness with the efforts so far to provide food and water to hurricane victims and to stop looting and lawlessness in New Orleans. “The results are not acceptable,” said Mr. Bush, who rarely admits failure.
This is an admission of failure? Why is he talking like someone else is responsible for the poor results? Whatever happened to “the buck stops here”?
Even Republicans were criticizing Mr. Bush and his administration for the sluggish relief effort. “I think it puts into question all of the Homeland Security and Northern Command planning for the last four years, because if we can’t respond faster than this to an event we saw coming across the Gulf for days, then why do we think we’re prepared to respond to a nuclear or biological attack?” said former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.
I think this is trenchant criticism, but let’s set it aside for now. As before, I want to tell the human story, which is the most urgent concern. And, as before, I’ll let photos do most of the talking.

But here’s a brief synopsis. The relief effort is finally making some headway, four days after Hurricane Katrina clobbered parts of Louisiana and Mississippi. Private charities like the Salvation Army and the Red Cross are doing their part. Some individuals are showing the beautiful side of human nature, opening up their homes to the homeless and raising money for the relief effort. (A welcome reminder amidst all the stories of looting and violence.)

Meanwhile, the survivors continue to suffer. They are evidencing every extreme of human emotion.

As before, all photos are culled from the hundreds available at news.yahoo.com. If you are are moved to make a donation, you might consider Mercy Corps. Only 8% of your money will go to administration, which is minimal. But give to the charity of your choice — I’m just making it as easy as possible for everyone to contribute what they can.


consider the sheer magnitude of the task
(/David J. Phillip/Pool/Reuters)
Thousands wait to be evacuated from the Louisiana Superdome in New Orleans, September 2, 2005.


in a patriotic mood … or maybe not
(AP Photo/Eric Gay)
Milvertha Hendricks, 84, waits in the rain with other flood victims outside the convention center in New Orleans, Thursday, Sept. 1, 2005.


rescued but her pain continues
(AP Photo/Dave Martin)
Sheila Dixon of New Orleans weeps as she clutches her 18-month-old daughter Emily as they sit on the side of Interstate-10 after being airlifted out of flood-besieged New Orleans on Wednesday, Aug. 31, 2005. Dixon wept uncontrollably, saying that everything she had was lost and she had no idea where she was being taken.

Advertisements

7 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. 49erDweet
    Sep 04, 2005 @ 01:15:00

    Great posting job, Q! Thanks for taking the time to put together such a well-rounded array of poignant graphics.

    BTW, I concur with the former house speaker’s conclusions. Bad show. In my grading system, considering the entire week’s output, they earned the following:

    NOLA city goverance – D minus
    LA state goverance – D
    US Admin governance – C minus

    Overall grade – D

    Not nearly good enough!

    Reply

  2. Q
    Sep 04, 2005 @ 11:03:00

    Thanks, 49er. I don’t know how many of the visitors to my site have dial-up service, but they may not thank me for posting 14 photos.

    I don’t want to play politics with this issue. Behind the criticism of the Bush administration lies genuine concern for the thousands of men, women, and children in misery, who waited four days for something to happen.

    btw, the Globe and Mail had a reporter at the convention center in New Orleans on Friday. She reported:

    Everyone from President George W. Bush on down is now talking cheerfully about all the aid pouring into the New Orleans area.

    But virtually none had arrived by day’s end [Friday] — only heavily armed reinforcements for the local New Orleans police, much-praised by the refugees here for their kindness, if not their ability to do anything.

    I appreciate your input because you make an important point: the criticism must be spread wider than just the Bush administration. I believe the governor of New Orleans is a Democrat (though I’m a bit fuzzy on these things, being a Canadian). So it isn’t a simple matter of Republicans bad, Democrats good.

    For those who are wondering why 49er places more blame on local governments than on the feds, 49er explained his rationale in an earlier comment:

    US law places upon local and state administrations, and not the feds, the responsibility for performing every manner of disaster planning and response. The fed support was in place and available. But the local effort was ill-planned.

    Again I point out that I’m a Canadian, so I can’t speak to US law. But I think Gingrich raises a valid point about Homeland Security, which is why I quoted him.

    In the event of a terrorist attack, isn’t Homeland Security responsible to provide quick relief on a grand scale? In the event of a terrorist attack, are they going to sit back and wait for the state government to organize a relief effort? What if the attack takes out the state government or the infrastructure within the state?

    For the Bush administration and for the American people, this disaster was a perfect test case for Homeland Security. And I think you grade them too generously when you give them a C minus.
    Q

    Reply

  3. 49erDweet
    Sep 05, 2005 @ 02:20:00

    Thanks for continuing to focus on the human side of this tragedy.

    Q may be right about the grade, but I’ve seen nothing, yet, to lower it further. An MSNBC special Saturday night on previous major hurricane disasters elicted the information that in Florida, after “Andrew” in 1992(?), in which everything worked fairly well, the National Guard relief units carrying supplies and security forces, showed up in force the morning of the fourth day, much to the relief of the victims struggling to just barely survive until help arrived.

    If that telecast was accurate, wasn’t it Thursday this week that the military convoy with relief supplies arrived on the flooded streets of NOLA? Whether that time lag is acceptable or reasonable, is another question.

    The anwwer to Q’s earlier query is the DHS uses multiple levels of responders, local, county [parrish], state and federal. (The theory being the closer to the event, the faster the response). That system worked fairly well in Florida, Mississippi and Alabama.

    Why it didn’t in NOLA, I’m sure, will be the subject of extremely close scrutiny in the coming years.

    But none of that will help the victims we’ve lost, nor the hundreds of thousands who are almost certainly permanently displaced.

    Reply

  4. Jack's Shack
    Sep 05, 2005 @ 02:44:00

    This raises so many questions. Surely the city of NO has/had some type of emergency plan.

    Did they invoke it and if so, what went wrong. What about the state’s involvement and of course what happened to FEMA and the Fed.

    What a horrid situation.

    Reply

  5. Mary P.
    Sep 05, 2005 @ 10:12:00

    What keeps stopping me dead is that they have several days’ notice (five? six?) that this was coming, and yet the response seems almost as poorly organized as if they’d had none at all.

    Reply

  6. Q
    Sep 05, 2005 @ 10:37:00

    • Mary P. has been asking another pointed question: why would government officials move thousands of people to the convention center and the Superdome, but not arrange basic supplies like food and water for them after they moved there?

    It’s a damned good question! I intend to blog on this theme soon.

    • In response to Jack’s comment, Surely the city of NO has/had some type of emergency plan

    The Ottawa Citizen reported,

    Dozens of plans and models have been produced over several decades predicting a severe hurricane hit on the city, including one published last year that predicted up to five metres of water in New Orleans and the evacuation of one million people. …

    Several experets said yesterday that the failure to predict that the levees keeping Lake Pontchartrain from flooding the city would be breached — and not just overflow — was crucial. There is no system for detecting a breach.

    It was an omission that appeared extraordinary

    Moreover, officials knew that about 100,000 residents of New Orleans live below the poverty line and

    were always going to lack the money and transport to get out of the city.

    Brian Wolshon, a former consultant on the state’s evacution plan, told the New York Times that at disaster planning meetings, when the question was raised about how to move out the “low-mobility” population, “there was often silence.”

    It is not clear what plans federal emergency management officials had in the event of the kind of disaster that hit New Orleans. …

    “Previous experience said that you mount that much [of a response] and you’ve got it under control, sociologist Shirley Laska said.

    But previous experience wasn’t going to help in New Orleans this week.

    The above information leaves a lot of questions unanswered. As 49er says, the response to this disaster is going to be scrutinized for years.

    Reply

  7. 49erDweet
    Sep 05, 2005 @ 13:34:00

    For those interested in NOLA’s preparedness levels, here is the official site to register volunteers to become “Community Emergency Response Technicians”. http://neworleanscert.org/. The site was still up and running as of Labor Day, presumably, but appeared to be last updated August 27, 2005.
    And here is the site for the state’s Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparation, http://www.ohsep.louisiana.gov/.
    The last link is a state-wide list of CERT teams by parish. http://training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/CERT/c_la.htm.

    I’ll leave it to others to judge for themselves if the level of community preparedness in and around the Crescent City was sufficient to the risks with which they continously lived.

    The hindsite question I have now is why did those having the foresight before the event to order the ‘staging’ of the city’s bus fleet to higher, safer grounds, not have the humanity to drive them first through the lowest (oh, wicked term) neighborhoods, honking their horns, and taking with them as many folk that wished to go as possible?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: