Canadian police send “agents provocateurs” into peaceful protest

There has been growing concern in Canada about a chill on peaceful, democratic protests. In the latest incident police officers, posing as protesters, allegedly attempted to incite violence at a protest in Montebello, Quebec.

If violence had broken out, it would have given the police a pretext to use force against the protesters.

The Sûreté du Québec initially denied the allegations, but now they admit that the three phony protesters were members of their force. They still deny that the officers were sent to stir up trouble.

The three “agents provocateurs” were carrying large rocks. They were confronted by a union leader who told them,

Go on, it’s our line. It’s a peaceful demonstration. … Put the rock down, cop.

Moments later, the three officers approached the police line. They “broke through” the line (against token resistance), then they were handcuffed and led away. It was an obvious charade to get the officers out of the predicament they were in, while maintaining the pretense that they were protesters.

If you would prefer to watch a professionally edited version of the footage, one is available (after viewing a brief advertisement) on the Globe and Mail site.

The Sûreté du Québec was operating under the oversight of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. The Globe and Mail reports:

Marlene Jennings, the federal Liberal justice critic, said the issue goes beyond the provincial police force.

“The RCMP has some explaining to do,” she told The Globe and Mail Thursday night. …

“We have people who blend in with the crowd. Everyone does that. All police forces in every country,” said Jean-Guy Dagenais, who heads the union of Quebec police officers (Association des policières et policiers provinciaux de Québec) that includes the Sûreté du Québec. …

But union leader Dave Coles, one of the organizers of the demonstration, said Monday’s incident went beyond any undercover police officer’s mandate.

“We’re not talking about someone that’s in plainclothes just walking amongst them. They were there armed with boulders. I witnessed them trying to incite a riot. I saw it,” said Mr. Coles, of the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada.

I should note that the chill on protests began under the Liberal government of Jean Chrétien, as part of the general heightening of security post-9/11. But there is a perception among some observers that the Conservative government of Stephen Harper models itself on the Bush Administration in its efforts to stifle dissent.

(What else would you call it when the RCMP remove journalists from the lobby of a public building to prevent them from asking the Government questions?)

Earlier this week, Prime Minister Harper openly mocked the protesters at Montebello:

I’ve heard it’s nothing. A couple hundred? It’s sad.

I didn’t like his tone at the time. It has become doubly offensive in light of the latest developments.


5 Comments (+add yours?)

    Aug 24, 2007 @ 11:37:58

    These actions erode our democracy by undermining Canadians’ right to express themselves peacefully.

    Visit to send your letter to Prime Minister Harper demanding police accountability:

    Click here to take action and send your letter on


  2. dan
    Aug 24, 2007 @ 13:02:41

    It’s sad, frustrating, infuriating, but hardly surprising. The cops have been using all sorts of tactics (like these and worse) on protesters for years.

    What is also sad is that the protest, as it currently exists, is also no longer capable of producing meaningful change.

    As far as I can tell, apart from an exceptional act of God, our only options for the creation of meaningful change are violence (which will produce change by accelerating the spiral of violence) or the Church once again becoming the Church. Thus, you see what is at stake for me when I lay my wager on the Church. If I thought the people of God were a lost cause, I don’t know what I would do. The Church is my last hope. Violence is the result of hopelessness.


  3. Knotwurth Mentioning
    Aug 24, 2007 @ 13:38:44

    Theoretically, running for office to change this is an option as well, but as s clear, equal opportunity doesn’t really exist. If you have a million bucks to help an average person run for office in an attempt to change the things, let me know, though. The system should theoretically be able to bring its abusers down.


  4. Scott
    Aug 28, 2007 @ 09:15:49

    Ah, that good ol’ government monopoly on violence.

    What a bunch of thugs.


  5. 49erDweet
    Aug 28, 2007 @ 10:18:01

    from “observers” to “agents of change”. How disgusting that police forces world wide so badly misunderstand – or misapply – their mandate to maintain the peace and uphold the law.

    As a former low-level LE supervisor I can only assume in many departments and agencies the monkeys are running the zoos.

    Sad, sad, sad


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: